Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Arnold's avatar

You knocked it out of the park, Emerald, per usual.

Expand full comment
Carl Eric Scott's avatar

Bull in a China shop style writing. One example. Here's a quote from the 2009 WSJ article Emerald centers here case upon: "When it became clear in the early 1990s that Gaza's Islamists had mutated from a religious group into a fighting force aimed at Israel -- particularly after they turned to suicide bombings in 1994 -- Israel cracked down with ferocious force." I.e., some actors working for Israeli intelligence and diplomacy arguably did "help" this group--how much is difficult to say--in its earliest stages, but that has not been the policy for, er, well, 29 years now. Emerald juices that into "why did the state of Israel help to create and fund Hamas for so long?"

I agree with the spirit of "let's be careful in this moment of moral outrage," present in this. Over at Powerline, you can find me in the comments vigorously defending Tucker and Vivek against Scott Johnson's unfair attack against them for taking a similar stand.

But far greater care is needed on this. Here we have a moment where elements of the Left and Center are finally returning to sanity on one issue, and where the knives are out for those who took the wrong stand on Israel for years. Much hypocrisy in that, but some good is possible from it also.

And of course those of us focused on the Covid/Vax Disaster, or on Biden's criminality, can only wince when up against the way this war is likely to hamper our efforts to draw attention to those stories. But we have to learn to swim in the waters we're in. I am noticing bad signs that conservatives alive to the Disaster are being tempted by conspiratorial-type theories of why this attack happened now. Pieces like this, when written in this way, do not help. Let's not charge in and unnecessarily step on a lot of knives, and confuse a lot of people who might, at bottom, be found to be more open to our take in the wake of Hamas' massacres, than before.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts