34 Comments
User's avatar
Willie Rodriguez's avatar

Count me in on the Tucker Carlson Candace Owen’s team. I believe going to war with Iran is a mistake. If they have nukes then they will use it if they don’t have nukes it’s regime change anyway. This thing could destroy our country by handing it over to the democrats. If it’s an Iraq type 💩 show MAGA gets the blame.

Expand full comment
AlahnaPundit's avatar

Sure - let Hitler have the Sudetenland, and all will be hunky-dory.

Expand full comment
Willie Rodriguez's avatar

Show the proof that Iran was planning to nuke Israel if they even have nukes. I am all for Israel defending themselves and they were doing just fine with that without bombing iran

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

They apparently don’t have a nuke yet, but are close. Trump has stated he wants to make sure they don’t get closer because Iran’s leaders constantly state their intent for building one is to “wipe the Satanic Israel and the Great Satan (U.S.) off the face of the earth”. You can find videos on YouTube.

Expand full comment
Willie Rodriguez's avatar

Yes and Iran wants to do it through its proxies like Israel uses the USA as its proxy there are YouTube videos of the Iranians stating so. Why would they nuke Israel when they want to conquer Israel? What use is radioactive land?

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

The radical Muslims hate Jewish and Christian people. Their religion instructs that all Infidels be erased. The leaders of Iran are radical.

Expand full comment
AlahnaPundit's avatar

Show me proof (aside from Tucker Carlson's say-so) that they won't. OK - neither of us can "prove" our side of it. The point is to compare the costs: What is the cost if you are wrong. and Iran WILL use the weapon against Israel - or though a terrorist cell - the US mainland? And what is the cost of making sure they don't?

You make your choice, and choose your side, I guess.

Expand full comment
Willie Rodriguez's avatar

Fair enough let’s see what happens if Trump blows up Iran then bugs out insuring no nukes then we are ok it’s good but you need regime change which destabilizes the world by opening a flank on Russia southern border now they are surrounded by more nato states. Sooner or later this leads to direct confrontation with Russia and yes china. This eventually goes nuclear. Let’s pray 🙏 for the best.

Expand full comment
AlahnaPundit's avatar

Trump stated - just in the last few hours at the flag-raising outside the White House - he does not want a fight. He has never advocated regime change (and vetoed a strike on Khomeini (sp?)), and has been adamant - and consistent - that his SOLE goal is preventing Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. But if you want Peace through Strength (as opposed to appeasement), you sometimes have to exercise your strength.

Neither Russia nor China want a nuclear-armed Iran. Besides, both are kinda busy right now (China's economy is tanking and they have eyes on Taiwan, not stirring up a war with the US over a nuclear-armed Iran that could threaten their oil purchases; you know about Russia).

Expand full comment
Willie Rodriguez's avatar

Every word of peace and negotiation he has spoken to Iran has been a proven lie. He admitted to this on truth social. He is going to kill the ayatollah and do a regime change. It’s not really about nukes it’s exactly about world conquest.

Expand full comment
Marie-Louise Murville's avatar

👍🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

06/18/25: Oh drat. The last five symbols (emojis") are simply upright rectangles on my screen, here at Don't Give A Darn Who's Calling Who What Names...

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

06/18/25: I think we could make some nice Lolly running the Elon Musk Hyperactive WDC Daycare Center. Let's DOGE the Smithsonian, transfer all that gunk they have in it out to a warehouse in Peoria AZ, and keep the kiddies busy with our tableaus of the exciting, thrilling, colossal accusations and counter-accusations of all of these Black Type Celebs, who apparently have the survival instincts of General Hillary Rodham Custer.

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

06/18/25: Count me on Nobody's Team. We're thinking for ourselves (this generally works out better than rooting for people that wouldn't return your phone call in a million years).

Expand full comment
Rightwingeraustin1492's avatar

Love you! Not in a weird way. 😂. Tucker is kooky but Trump isn’t for calling for the assassination of the leader of another country! Wow! Totally unhinged! I can’t really watch Lindell TV. Except you. Totally for war with Iran. A Lindell TV reporter lied and said Trump has been consistent with Iran. No he hasn’t. He’s constantly moving the goal posts towards war with Iran.

Expand full comment
MLR's avatar

So tell me again Emerald why it’s ok for the barbarians to have nuclear weapons. Is it just that they’re only interested taking care of the evil Zionists who control the world and DJT?

Expand full comment
Rightwingeraustin1492's avatar

Even if they do so what? North Korea has nuclear weapons, so does Russia? They do a lotta bad stuff too. What about the IDF doing “barbaric” atrocities in Gaza and Lebanon? Oh yeah that doesn’t count for you Zionist Israel firsters. Looks like you need to move to your favorite country Israhell.

Expand full comment
MLR's avatar

NK and Russia aren’t crazy Islamists. Sorry I got your kafia all in a tizzy. 1492 is a reference to the Spanish expulsion of the Jews which demonstrates your animosity to the people from whom Jesus arose. I suggest you contact CAIR for further instructions.

Expand full comment
Fritz Dahmus's avatar

Live and very personal debates with complete honesty and passion......are good for a free society.

We are still a free society???

Expand full comment
mitro roman's avatar

Although all this infighting is somewhat entertaining, I find it sad that these Republicans/conservatives are fighting themselves rather than the real enemy (left, radical Islam). I count all the people you mentioned on the good guys' team, except for Graham and maybe Shapiro. The fact is this is NOT an easy issue and NOT a black and white issue. For example, while we all understand and don't want forever wars, Iran having nuclear weapons is a major concern. Tucker's team doesn't seem to acknowledge this or have a better solution. Most people on the right will support Trump because he generally has good judgment and supports our causes. He has to also work with the RINO snakes to get things done (Big Bill, etc.). I generally support Tucker, but thought he came across negatively when he interviewed Cruz. His valid points became lost by trying to one up Cruz.

Expand full comment
Danny Huckabee's avatar

Very funny! And true! The mullahs are a menace to all Christians., Jews, all other religions, plus most.... Muslims. That being the foundation of our policy. I wished we'd used sanctions like in the 1st Trump term. Those had the Islamo-fascists down to $4BB in cash and on the verge of collapse, without firing a shot. Instead, the Israelis are dragging us into another war, just like Iraq, which was their enemy, but not ours.

I trust President Trump to exhaust all peaceful avenues before he uses military tools to bring the mullahs to the table.

Danny Huckabee

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

Stupid. All of it. Why lower yourself to this?

Expand full comment
Terie's avatar

Well, I usually enjoy your writing, but this is tabloid stuff and well below you. Why even give your time to this when there’s so many things more important

Expand full comment
AlahnaPundit's avatar

So far, Trump's only public position is that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. His position on use of US military seems to be: Not happening unless Iran attacks our forces (implying that Israel can get the termination work done with only passive US assistance - intel & defense).

So - are the "Tucker people" opposed to that position? Not, apparently, expressly - but they're arguing vehemently with anyone that supports the President. Do they think it's OK for Iran to have a nuclear weapon? O'Bozo and the Biden-puppet were happy to help Iran, so are the "Tucker people" on board with Barry & Co.? Do they think Iran just won't get there - that their nuclear program is a hoax and doesn't exist? Or do they think a nuclear-armed Iran would come to its senses and join the responsible international community (rejecting their often iterated "Death to America" chanting - the sort of position Neville Chamberlain took)?

Bottom line: Do the "Tucker people" think the US has no business caring whether Iran becomes armed with nuclear weapons - which it could either use or transfer to an appropriate sponsored terror-organization (maybe one with a cell within the US)?

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

Caitlyn Jenner stuck in a bunker ... HA. That's one bright spot in this dark situation.

Expand full comment
amdoremi's avatar

OK kids, go stand in the corner! REALLY???

Expand full comment
Rightwingeraustin1492's avatar

Yeah maybe get of here if you want to make peace with neocon warmongering psychopaths.

Expand full comment
Karon Mitchell's avatar

I have watched enough of Tucker’s interviews to believe that he’s correct about the “forever” wars. Those who want all the regime change wars only want to keep their gravy train running. But the MAGA people need to stop the infighting and get it together. This may be our one and only chance to get it done. All of this is going straight into my file of “you just can’t make this stuff up”!

Expand full comment
From the Beach...🌞🇧🇷🏖️🌊🐬🌎😎's avatar

Your pith , Emerald, is engaging! Don't you just love the talking heads brigade! Does Tucker's son dress as a snake for Halloween?

Expand full comment
4Freedom's avatar

Anyone notice aged trannies don’t look like old women but rather look like the old men they are?

Expand full comment