When one actually reads what the law does - it looks like fairly standard legislation: little is actually defined. There is a broad outline/authority-created. But the actual manifestation is left, in large part, to the executive.
This, of course, provides fertile ground for speculation that evil will be done, and treason a fait accompli. But it also provides ground for speculation that cooperation with some of the capable minds resident in Israel (not to mention the US) could result in some design synergies.
For now, much will depend on the Trump Administration's handling. Tucker tells us Trump is Netanyahu's puppet; other news accounts tell us Trump most definitely views himself as the "Boss" of all mid-East policy. After 2028, who knows what will be the case? For now, I'm skeptical of the Tucker-Owens faction, and willing to wait-and-see . . .
Cruz and the Judaizers are to be ignored. The Covenant with Abraham was fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the New Covenant in His Blood. The Catholic Church is the promised land and the home of Abraham's promised descendants. All are welcome to enter. All must enter to be saved, including pagans, Muslims and Jews.
Sir, I expressly called for supporting Israel. I simply came out with logical reasons to be against the FUTURES provisions of the 2027 NDAA. How does that qualify as being like Candace Owens?
When one actually reads what the law does - it looks like fairly standard legislation: little is actually defined. There is a broad outline/authority-created. But the actual manifestation is left, in large part, to the executive.
This, of course, provides fertile ground for speculation that evil will be done, and treason a fait accompli. But it also provides ground for speculation that cooperation with some of the capable minds resident in Israel (not to mention the US) could result in some design synergies.
For now, much will depend on the Trump Administration's handling. Tucker tells us Trump is Netanyahu's puppet; other news accounts tell us Trump most definitely views himself as the "Boss" of all mid-East policy. After 2028, who knows what will be the case? For now, I'm skeptical of the Tucker-Owens faction, and willing to wait-and-see . . .
I read it in detail. My article sums up what it will permit. And that isn’t a good idea, as I point out.
"Beware of sentimental alliances where the consciousness of good deeds is the only compensation for noble sacrifices."
"What we learn from History is that no one learns from History" - Otto von Bismarck
They’re not merging, Mrs Mo Massie.
I wrote this. Not Emerald.
Same.
Ah, logic.
Yes, correct. Glad you were able to recognize it.
Cruz and the Judaizers are to be ignored. The Covenant with Abraham was fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the New Covenant in His Blood. The Catholic Church is the promised land and the home of Abraham's promised descendants. All are welcome to enter. All must enter to be saved, including pagans, Muslims and Jews.
It's hard to ignore them when they set, or at least greatly influence, US policies.
Anything that destroys your IRGC. More Tucker / Candace vibes from your guests.
Sir, I expressly called for supporting Israel. I simply came out with logical reasons to be against the FUTURES provisions of the 2027 NDAA. How does that qualify as being like Candace Owens?