Wikipedia Finally Comes For Me!
Is the CIA begging people for donations to its favorite misinformation site again?
The Right Way is the #1 conservative blog on Substack — recommended by over 233 other Substack authors!
Let’s start by telling the truth: Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information.
In fact, Wikipedia is often “revised” by spooks at the CIA and the FBI. According to an article in Reuters from 2007: “People using CIA and FBI computers have edited entries in the online encyclopedia Wikipedia on topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo prison, according to a new tracing program.”
Not to mention the fact that Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger told Glenn Greenwald on his new show that the CIA and FBI essentially control the site.
After all, a Wikipedia page magically appeared for me — for the very first time — just last week.
That’s very strange since last week was the first time that I have even been deposed in a lawsuit regarding election fraud: Smartmatic v Newsmax.
What are the odds?
Remember, I didn’t have a Wikipedia page in 2017, or 2018, or 2019, or 2020, or 2021, or 2022 — but last week it appears.
That’s not all. Suddenly, I’m included in two new categories: “COVID-19 conspiracy theorists” and “American conspiracy theorists.”
This is high praise indeed from the Deep State.
Look at all this distinguished company that I’m keeping: Michael Yeadon, Naomi Wolf, Peter Navarro, Luc Montagnier, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Lara Logan, Alex Jones, Robert Kennedy Jr., Tucker Carlson.
The anonymous author of my Wikipedia page is supposedly a user named “Isi96” — who calls himself “Isira” and describes himself as a resident of Sri Lanka who works in “software development.”
Do you know a lot of Sri Lankans who spend their days building encyclopedia pages (for fun!) on American citizens who don’t like deadly gene therapies produced by the pharmaceutical industry?
Does that sound plausible to you?
Here’s Steve Kirsch — who deserves to be on this list too! — explaining how Wikipedia is used by America’s national security state to pervert history and spread disinformation.
What could possibly make this situation even more bizarre?
How about this: it appears the CIA is begging people for donations on Wikipedia right now.
That’s hilarious and diabolical.
I’ve compiled a handy list for people to understand how many of our so-called “institutions” are essentially third-party proxies for The Company.
People ask me all the time: what’s the best part of being a famous “conspiracy theorist” according to the corrupt corporate media?
I always tell them: the best part is not having myocarditis.
I Need Your Help!
I was the first reporter to tell you that Dr. Fauci funded the Wuhan Lab in 2020.
Then I was banned from Twitter in 2021 because I warned you about the dangerous COVID “vaccines.”
Then left-wing hate groups targeted me in Washington Post articles to keep me banned on social media forever in 2022.
Now in 2023, the voting machine companies Smartmatic and Dominion want to search through my emails and telephone records .
It’s very expensive to prepare for litigation, and discovery, in these massive lawsuits brought by the voting machine companies. (Fox News paid out almost $800 million just last year.) They try to bankrupt and silence conservative journalists by dragging them through court proceedings for years.
Independent and fearless journalists need your support like never before.
I need your support like never before.
If we are going to survive the current regime then we must stand together.
I’ve got your back. Do you have mine?
Hah! Wear that badge with honor, Emerald! For years I have used Wikipedia to vet people who I wasn't sure whether they were solid conservative patriots or just fake conservatives or worse.
I have found that if Wikipedia denigrates them and smears them as conspiracy theorists or "extreme right wing", then I know the person of interest is probably a true blue commonsense patriot with traditional, classic conservative leanings. My conclusions using this crude means of analysis have been accurate 90% of the time.
I am wary of people whose Wikipedia entry is fairly neutral, positive, or glowingly admirable. They're almost always anywhere from moderate Leftwing socialists up through corrupt Democrat totalitarians.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command... and if all others accepted the lie, which the party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth"
1984 - George Orwell